My Photo

From the
Fascist's Mouth

What I'm Reading

Answers

« Obama Credits GOP for OBL's Escape | Main | Supreme Court Strikes Down Second-Amendment! »

Comments

mandible claw

HOWEVER, there is NO evidence forthcoming that Iran has any nuclear weapons. And in these circumstances, it is clearly not going to attack either the USA or Israel. You have NO grounds either to threaten or attack Iran. None.

Posted by: b12 | June 27, 2008 at 02:53 PM

There will continue to be NO evidence either, until after Israel has been bombed into the ground, and even then it would have been the Jews' fault.*
````````````````````````````````````````
*Big book of rules for liberal thought, Pg. 146 Clause 12. Subsection A2.

mandible claw

HOWEVER, there is NO evidence forthcoming that Iran has any nuclear weapons. And in these circumstances, it is clearly not going to attack either the USA or Israel. You have NO grounds either to threaten or attack Iran. None.

Posted by: b12 | June 27, 2008 at 02:53 PM

PARIS — Iran’s Revolutionary Guards test-fired nine missiles in war-game maneuvers on Wednesday, including at least one the government in Tehran described as having the range to reach Israel.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/10/world/asia/10iran.html?bl&ex=1215748800&en=bfa61dce8f16e341&ei=5087

It's like rai-ai-ain... On your wedding day

feelthelove

Linked for you, MC

Oh, and this is for Pall, who 'reads the NYT' every day. He should have been right on this unless he, like you, is in a state of denial, irish.

Don't you love the irony of the article? 'Iran is developing their nuclear capability for civilian purposes and not weapons, even though they just fired off a test nuke.'

You were saying, Eye-ish?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Where does it say "test nuke"?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Moronic twat.

feelthelove

"Last weekend, Iran signaled that it would not comply with United Nations Security Council resolutions requiring it to stop enriching uranium. During his European visit, Mr. Bush won pledges from some European leaders to tighten sanctions against Iran.

But Iran’s foreign minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, said his country was prepared to open comprehensive negotiations with the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, and the six world powers — the United States, Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China — that have proposed a set of incentives to resolve the impasse over Iran’s nuclear program." cut and pasted from NYT article.

I paraphrased, assclown. So the hell what? You are so fuckin' concerned with accuracy over jihadists but are blind to your own idiocies in reporting what you think are atrocities when all it is is spin.
Now, about the British Army soldier who was court-martialed. Why no concern over his actions? Hm?
****************************************************************************
Moronic twat.

Posted by: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | July 10, 2008 at 02:44 PM

Projection. Once again, you are on the road to recovery by admitting you have a problem with what you are. That is the first step. See if you can take the rest of the steps and stop posting drivel.


mandible claw

Whoops!!!11

A free-ee ri-i-i-i-de, when you're already late..

mandible claw

You've ducked that URL FIVE TIMES now, Mandy. I think it's safe to assume you're running like bloody hell because you can't answer it and don't know jack schitt about the subject.

The End


Posted by: xyz | June 27, 2008 at 02:15 PM

It's answered, on the other thread. I was referring to massacres of Protestants several hundred years ago, completely irrelevant to the Stevens inquiry.

As you will see on the other thread, no response made to that except "you know nothing about Irish history."

Ducking and running, again.

xxxxliberal

"Ducking and running, again."

Posted by: mandible claw

MandyBoots,

irish appears to have written:

"I have no intention of wasting my time with someone who knows so little of Irish history that he's prepared to write, "the Irish massacred Protestants therefore Ireland is a genocide nation". And who, to compound that matter, announces he's "not interested in historical accuracy"."

----------------------------------------------

I'm not remotely surprised. If you think anyone is going to take you by the hand from 1169 to 1998 in order to rectify your gross ignorance of Irish history, you have another think coming. I know 'irish' has far better things to do. And so have I, you great ignoramus.

xxxxliberal

"I paraphrased, assclown. So the hell what?"
-- feelthelove

You "paraphrased" by changing something from non-nuclear to nuclear?? And then you say "so what?"

Go back to your bottles and cans, you mentally deficient slug.

feelthelove

Projection again as usual, I see. First of all, what evidence do you have that US troops in Gitmo actually abused the Koran? I want to see five sources that did not print retractions to the story.

Yet you persist in your asstard belief. If there is anyone mentally deficient, it is YOU.

xxxxliberal

Nuclear. The subject was nuclear and non-nuclear -- NOT Guantanamo.

Moron. Clown. Idiot.

xxxxliberal

You "paraphrased" by changing something from non-nuclear to nuclear?? And then you say "so what?"

Brainless sod.

feelthelove

You make accusations about dissing the Koran in Gitmo, are proven wrong and say 'So what? I am a true believer in all accusations against the United States, therefore, in spite of retractions, I will still believe.'

You are projecting again. First of all, did anyone DIE from me saying 'test nukes?' Was anyone killed in the rioting that ensued? If there was rioting, that is. If anyone was killed. Now, if you were to get killed because I said that, or you offed yourself, I would giggle and say 'Oops.'

You are the brainless sod of which you speak.

The subject is your bashing of the US and when you get your nose rubbed in it you whinge and change the subject or find something completely irrelevant to harp on because you can't handle it.
You are a sadistic ignorant POS.

x3

↑↑
(You have to feel sorry for Cricket. She doesn't even KNOW when she's making a complete and utter fool of herself -- but she'll still go ahead and call someone else a "sadistic POS")

xxxxliberal

"You make accusations about dissing the Koran in Gitmo"

Posted by: feelthelove

There's a lot, lot, worse than "dissing the Koran" going on in Guantanamo, you freak. And you call ME ignorant??

ROFLMAO!

You dun really well, Cricket! LOLOL!

xxxxliberal

PS, Cricket:

Nuclear is NOT a paraphrase of non-nuclear. Understand? Of such utter shite are wars made. Thank god you don't edit the NYT.

LOLOLOL

x3

'feelthehate' will now retain a 'dignified' silence regarding nuclear/non-nuclear as she does not like to be called by her real name -- Cricket. Nach cliste an sock í!

feelthelove

What silence, Nora/megatwat/ireish/mariana/fuckedmacktruck?
Lessee, you have no proof I am Cricket.
You have no proof the Koran was dissed because of the lies that Newsweek printed and then retracted.
You have no proof of torture or 'solitary confinement' in Gitmo because there is no 'solitary confinement' as such. One inmate per cell is not 'solitary' as in 'no contact,' lamebrain.

You dun reely porely, gaylick shalleilagh.

irish

Oh, so you're UN Doctor now, feelthehate??

UNDERSTAND THIS: Nuclear is NOT a paraphrase of non-nuclear. Understand? Of such shite are wars made.

And anyone who thinks nuclear and non-nuclear are interchangeable shouldn't even dream of opening his/her mouth about Chomsky. You're not fit to clean his shoes, you pathetic idiot.

irish

Feelthehate: Go have a bath or clean your nose or something. Or have another bottle of beer. You're not capable of contributing here. You do yourself nothing but harm. Every single day.

Go sleepsy, sweet dreams!

feelthelove

Sounds like you are in need of a colonic yourself, dickhead. All that wind you have been blowing for the past few years...tch tch tch.

But then again, technology hasn't come up with the rectal/cranial colonic board or machine. I suppose we will just have to let you flatulate until you are purged.

feelthelove

PS, Cricket:

Nuclear is NOT a paraphrase of non-nuclear. Understand? Of such utter shite are wars made. Thank god you don't edit the NYT.

LOLOLOL

Posted by: xxxxliberal | July 12, 2008 at 12:36 AM

UNDERSTAND THIS: Nuclear is NOT a paraphrase of non-nuclear. Understand? Of such shite are wars made.

And anyone who thinks nuclear and non-nuclear are interchangeable shouldn't even dream of opening his/her mouth about Chomsky. You're not fit to clean his shoes, you pathetic idiot.


Posted by: irish | July 12, 2008 at 02:34 PM

Oh, do tell me that you weren't plagiarizing xxxxlaxlibtard's work. I guess you can't steal from yourself when you are a sockpuppet.

Bwahahahahaha!

Nope, not even close to the UN Doc. I take it the Doctor is male, but I could be wrong.

Byeee!

Oh, and one other thing; you are projecting again. I paraphrased it for effect, asshole. Deliberately, with intent, just to watch you go into spasms. This IS a satire site, remember? You need to grow the hell up and quit sucking on the government teat.

feelthelove

Wrong about me, as usual. Seems that Cricket hasn't been here for awhile. Too bad. She was civil, if a bit sweet. You are just pissed because never in a million years could you even hope to beg for the privilege of cleaning her shoes. I wouldn't want to clean Chomsky's shoes. I might get a communicable disease.

Nighty-night.

irish

"I paraphrased it for effect, asshole." -- feelthelove

Quite lying, you pathetic buffoon.

And look up the definition of "paraphrase".

It does NOT mean changing non-nuclear to nuclear. No matter how hard you twist your non-existent spinal chord. You're too ridiculous for words.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Fair Trade
Gift Shop

  • fairtradelogo.jpg

Sites I'm Banned From